The 50 political corporation STATES have always been stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and they are stealing land from We the People of the United States of America and other nations too and these Defendant STATES and COUNTIES and MUNICIPALITIES steal our resources and try to sell our resources back to us while extorting at the same time and it just does not pan out for the Defendants because the Defendants steal our Water and try to sell our Water back to our People and if our People cannot pay the extortion then the Defendants will shut our People's water off which is war and the Defendants will NOT stop stealing from We the People of the United States all on their own because the Defendants have always been stealing land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and there is no point in the foreseeable future where the Defendants might stop stealing land with a gun so join the class action RICO lawsuit and put a stop to this 2000 year war
| CLOSED,AMDCMP,JURY,LC02 |
Zahler v. United States et al Assigned to: Senior Judge Edward F. Shea Cause: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Date Filed: 05/15/2012 Date Terminated: 01/23/2013 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Jurisdiction: Federal Question |
| Plaintiff | ||
|
Eric Zahler (12 Stats, 951, Article 1) United States |
represented by | Eric Zahler
PO Box 11084 Yakima, WA 98909 509-910-9896 PRO SE |
V. | ||
| Defendant | ||
| United States | ||
| Defendant | ||
| United States Supreme Court | ||
| Defendant | ||
| Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals | ||
| Defendant | ||
| U S District Court of Washington | ||
| Defendant | ||
|
New York, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Pennsylvania, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
West Virginia, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Virginia, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
North Carolina, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
South Carolina, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Georgia State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Florida, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Maine, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Vermont, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
New Hampshire, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Massachusettes, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Rhode Island, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Connecticut, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Delaware, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Maryland, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
New Jersey, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
State of Allcomers
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Alaska, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Hawaii, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
North Dakota, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
South Dakota, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Nebraska, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Kansas, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Oklahoma, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Minnesota, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Iowa, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Missouri, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Arkansas, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Louisiana, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Wisconsin, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Illinois, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Mississippi, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Indiana, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Kentucky, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Tennessee, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Alabama, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Texas, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
New Mexico, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Arizona, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
California, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Nevada, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Utah, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Wyoming, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Montana, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Idaho, State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Oregon State of
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
| Washington, State of | ||
| Defendant | ||
| Yakima County | ||
| Defendant | ||
| Yakima, City of | ||
| Defendant | ||
| Union Gap, City of | ||
| Defendant | ||
|
All Other Comers
TERMINATED: 01/16/2013 |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Robert Almeida as Police Chief for City of Union Gap |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Robert Northcott as Judge for City of Union Gap |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Melonee Moser as Court Administrator for City of Union Gap |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Christina Chapman as Court Clerk for City of Union Gap |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Dominic Rizzi as Police Chief for City of Yakima |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Susan Woodard as Presiding Judge for City of Yakima |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Kelley C Olwell as Judge for City of Yakima |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Kevin G Eilmes as Court Administrator for City of Yakima |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Linda S Hagert as Court Services Manager for City of Yakima |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Ken Irwin as Sheriff for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Susan L Hahn as Presiding Judge for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Michael G McCarthy as Judge for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
F James Gavin as Judge for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Blaine G Gibson as Judge for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
David A Elofson as Judge for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Robert E Lawrence-Berrey as Judge for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Richard H Bartheld as Judge for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Ruth E Reukauf as Judge for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Robert W Inouye as Court Commissioner for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Lani-Kai Swanhart as Court Commissioner for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Gayle M Harthcock as Court Commissioner for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Robyn Berndt as Court Administrator for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
|
Harold Delia as Court Consultant for Yakima County |
||
| Defendant | ||
| 50 corporate STATES, The | ||
| Defendant | ||
| corporate UNITED STATES, The | ||
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 05/15/2012 | 2 | RECEIVED COMPLAINT - R.I.C.O. 18 U.S.C. 1962 - CLASS ACTION - Receipt # none (IFP) Filed by Eric Zahler.(LE, Case Administrator) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/15/2012: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (LE, Case Administrator). (Entered: 05/15/2012) |
| 05/16/2012 | 3 | ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff seeks to file in forma pauperis a pro se Complaint. Because it appears Plaintiff lacks sufficient funds to prosecute this action, the District Court Executive shall file the complaint without payment of the filing fee. In addition, the District Court Executive shall set a case management review for 30 days, and shall immediately deliver the captioned file to the assigned judicial officer, who will review the complaint for legal sufficiency and determine whether to direct service. Case Management Deadline set for 6/15/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Imbrogno. (LE, Case Administrator) (Entered: 05/16/2012) |
| 05/16/2012 | 4 | COMPLAINT - R.I.C.O. 18 USC 1962 CLASS ACTION against All Defendants ( Filing fee $.00; Receipt # IFP). Summons not issued. Jury Demand. Filed by Eric Zahler.(LE, Case Administrator) (Entered: 05/16/2012) |
| 05/18/2012 | 5 | NOTICE of Change of Address by Eric Zahler (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 05/22/2012) |
| 05/18/2012 | 6 | Letter/Notice from Eric Zahler to Troy Lee & Associates dated 5/16/2012 re: representation in State Court proceedings (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 05/22/2012) |
| 05/24/2012 | 7 | First NOTICE About the Municipal Court Test Case by Eric Zahler (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 05/25/2012) |
| 05/24/2012 | 8 | NOTICE of Fraudulent Addition of States by Eric Zahler (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 05/25/2012) |
| 06/01/2012 | 9 | NOTICE OF POINTS by Eric Zahler (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 06/04/2012) |
| 07/05/2012 | 10 | NOTICE of Change of Address by Eric Zahler (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 07/09/2012) |
| 11/15/2012 | 11 | ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT; Amended Complaint must be filed within 60 days of the date of this Order. Amended Complaint Deadline set for 1/14/2013. Signed by Senior Judge Edward F. Shea. (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 11/15/2012) |
| 01/16/2013 | 12 | FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 18 USC 1962 RICO CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT against Yakima, City of, Washington, State of, United States Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Union Gap, City of, U S District Court of Washington, Yakima County, Robert Almeida, Robert Northcott, Melonee Moser, Christina Chapman, Dominic Rizzi, Susan Woodard, Kelley C Olwell, Kevin G Eilmes, Linda S Hagert, Ken Irwin, Susan L Hahn, Michael G McCarthy, F James Gavin, Blaine G Gibson, David A Elofson, Robert E Lawrence-Berrey, Richard H Bartheld, Ruth E Reukauf, Robert W Inouye, Lani-Kai Swanhart, Gayle M Harthcock, Robyn Berndt, Harold Delia, 50 corporate STATES, The, and corporate UNITED STATES, The. Defendants terminated are: All Other Comers, Arizona, State of, Arkansas, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of, Delaware, State of, Florida, State of, Georgia State of, Hawaii, State of, Idaho, State of, Illinois, State of, Indiana, State of, Iowa, State of, Kansas, State of, Kentucky, State of, Louisiana, State of, Maine, State of, Maryland, State of, Massachusettes, State of, Minnesota, State of, Mississippi, State of, Missouri, State of, Montana, State of, Nebraska, State of, Nevada, State of, New Hampshire, State of, New Jersey, State of, New Mexico, State of, New York, State of, North Carolina, State of, North Dakota, State of, Oklahoma, State of, Oregon State of, Pennsylvania, State of, Rhode Island, State of, South Carolina, State of, South Dakota, State of, State of Allcomers, Tennessee, State of, Texas, State of, Utah, State of, Vermont, State of, Virginia, State of, West Virginia, State of, Wisconsin, State of, Wyoming, State of, Alabama, State of and Alaska, State of. Filed by Eric Zahler.(CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 01/18/2013) |
| 01/16/2013 | 13 | NOTICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL by Eric Zahler (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 01/18/2013) |
| 01/16/2013 | 14 | NOTICE OF EVIDENCE RULE 904 ADMISSIBILITY OF DOCUMENTS by Eric Zahler - PART 1. (Attachments: # 1 pages 97 - 183)(CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 01/18/2013) |
| 01/16/2013 | 15 | Additional Attachments to Main Document re 14 Notice of Evidence Rule 904 Admissibility of Documents by Eric Zahler. (Attachments: # 1 Pages 268 - 342)(CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 01/18/2013) |
| 01/16/2013 | 16 | Additional Attachments to Main Document re 14 Notice of Evidence Rule 904 Admissibility of Documents by Eric Zahler. (Attachments: # 1 Pages 419 - 456)(CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 01/18/2013) |
| 01/23/2013 | 17 | ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CLOSING FILE; First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Edward F. Shea. (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 01/23/2013) |
| 01/23/2013 | 18 | JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants (CV, Case Administrator) (Entered: 01/23/2013) |
| PACER Service Center | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction Receipt | |||
| 04/01/2013 16:46:15 | |||
| PACER Login: | za0293 | Client Code: | |
| Description: | Docket Report | Search Criteria: | 2:12-cv-03075-EFS |
| Billable Pages: | 5 | Cost: | 0.50 |
United States District Court of Yakama
25 South 3rd Street Yakama 98901
This court has been fraudulently named
EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON
The case number is CV 2:12-03075-EFS
Eric Zahler of Yakama,
United States
V
FIRST AMENDEND COMPLAINT
18 USC 1962 RICO
CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
Participants added;
CITY OF UNION GAP
Robert Almeida as Police Chief
Robert Northcott as Judge
Melonee Moser as Court Administrator
Christina Chapman as Court Clerk
CITY OF YAKIMA
Dominic Rizzi as Police Chief
Susan J Woodard as Presiding Judge
Kelley C Olwell as Judge
Kevin G Eilmes as Court Commissioner
Linda S Hagert as Court Services Manager
YAKIMA COUNTY
Ken Irwin as Sheriff
Susan L Hahn as Presiding Judge
Michael G McCarthy as Judge
F James Gavin as Judge
Blaine G Gibson as Judge
David A Elofson as Judge
Robert E Lawrence-Berrey as Judge
Richard H Bartheld as Judge
Ruth E Reukauf as Judge
Robert W Inouye as Court Commissioner
Lani-Kai Swanhart as Court Commissioner
Gayle M Harthcock as Court Commissioner
Robyn Berndt as Court Administrator
Harold Delia as Court Consultant
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
The 50 corporate STATES,
The corporate UNITED STATES,
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT,
NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS,
U.S. DISTRICT COURTS OF WASHINGTON
LR 3.2
RICO CASE STATEMENT
Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 11 Attorney General Eric Zahler of Yakama hereby represent to the Court and certify that to the best of my personal knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances and this representation is not being presented for any improper purpose, and the claims herein are warranted by existing law and the factual contentions have evidentiary support and will likely have additional evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation and discovery following information:
(a) State whether the alleged unlawful conduct is in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a), (b), (c), and/or (d).
(a) The Defendants are killing Us and the Defendants are in debasement because of it and the Defendants pretend to be our government while the Defendants commit genocide by destroying our homes and our food and clothing sources and other things that we need and destroying things that We need is something that our own government would not do and that is how I know for sure that these Defendants are not our government at all because these Defendants are just a bold bunch of crooks stealing our Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and the Defendants are not a bit shy about covering up our People while they are at it and the Defendants extort our People and kidnap our People and hold our People in the Defendants’ debtors prisons in order to extort our People and their families and the Defendants are gambling with usury and the Defendants maintain control of the enterprise which is engaged in unlawful activities which effects interstate and foreign commerce because the Defendants are intentionally killing We the People of the United States of America and our friends by destroying our once abundant Salmon runs and wild game herds and the had Yakamas always had Salmon and wild game in abundance and the Defendants are killing our herds which is killing us which is genocide which is murder and extortion is racketeering too and the Defendants conduct their enterprises’ affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity and collection of unlawful debts so of course the Defendants are in debasement conspiring to violate Title 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a), (b), (c), and (d)
(b) List each defendant and state the alleged misconduct and basis of liability of each defendant.
(b) CITYOFUNIONGAP is ran by a bold bunch of crooks in debasement stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and extorting We the People of the United States of America and Robert Almeida carries a gun in furtherance of that criminal conspiracy in violation of Title 18 United States code § 1962(a), (b), (c), and (d), and in violation of the Treaty with the Yakama Nation of Indians (12 Stat. 951) and Robert Northcott and Melonee Moser and Christina Chapman manage the Conspirators’ extortion racket enterprise in debasement
CITYOFYAKIMA is ran by a bold bunch of crooks in debasement stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and extorting We the People of the United States of America and Dominic Rizzi carries a gun in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy in violation of Title 18 United States code § 1962(a), (b), (c), and (d), and in violation of the Treaty with the Yakama Nation of Indians (12 Stat. 951) and Susan J Woodard and Kelley C Olwell and Kevin G Eilmes and Linda S Hagert manage the Conspirators’ extortion racket enterprise in debasement
YAKIMACOUNTY is ran by a bold bunch of crooks in debasement stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and extorting We the People of the United States of America and Ken Irwin carries a gun in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy in violation of Title 18 United States code § 1962(a), (b), (c), and (d), and in violation of the Treaty with the Yakama Nation of Indians (12 Stat. 951) and Susan L Hahn and Michael G McCarthy and F James Gavin and Blaine G Gibson and David A Elofson and Robert E Lawrence-Berrey and Richard H Bartheld and Ruth E Reukauf and Robert W Inouye and Lani-Kai Swanhart and Gayle M Harthcock and Robyn Berndt and Harold Delia manage the Conspirators’ YAKIMACOUNTY extortion racket enterprise in debasement
And each of the above named Defendants in debasement follow the same business model of acquiring Land at the barrel of a gun and then extorting the inhabitants thereof and the Defendants exact every kind of fine and fee imaginable from We the People of the United States of America and the Defendants’ courts accuse our People of pretend crimes and the Defendants lay un-rebuttable presumptions on our People which the Defendants assume to be true and guilt is assured and the Defendants will not give our People discovery and the Defendants will not let our People defend because the Defendants cannot convict so the Defendants bluff and set excessive bail and inflict cruel and unusual punishment and the Defendants lock our People in a debtor prison and mental institutions and poison our People under the guise of medicine and the Defendants deport our Mexicans and the Defendants engage in all sorts of unlawful activities in furtherance of the Defendants’ extortion racket enterprise in debasement and the Defendants have gotten away with treachery for more than a hundred fifty years now and the Defendants are engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity right now and the crux of the argument is that these Defendant judges knowingly proceed against our People wholly without crucial points of jurisdiction and the Defendants obstruct discovery and the local public defenders pretend that it is not happing but this lawsuit is expected to piece the Defendants up and coax a great number of Witnesses and Plaintiffs and Defendants from out of the woodwork which will help piece these Defendants up further and induce the Defendants to snitch on their business partners in debasement trying to kill Us
(c) List the alleged wrongdoers, other than the defendants listed above, and state the alleged misconduct of each wrongdoer.
(c) It is difficult to determine who all is conspiring with the Defendants in debasement or merely working for them with unwitting participation however there is certainly an aggressive element to the Defendants officers’ abusive collection activities where collection agents are disguised as court clerks obstructing anyone trying to defend and our People are told “plead guilty and go home” and if the plea is not guilty our People find that Our speedy trial rights where made vacuous by the Defendants’ own arbitrary courts so our People could spend a considerable amount time in jail in lieu of excessive bail or a guilty plea and then our People are expected to pay endless fines and fees and any mere accusation is assumed to be true and guilt is assured and too often our People are made to choose between life and limb because of the aggressive collection tactics and total disregard for the Law that these Defendants and the Defendants’ officers show and these Defendants back administrations that have absolutely no lawful claim to any of the Land that these Defendants charge rent on and impose travel restrictions on which is Land within United States territory and the Defendants enforce travel restrictions that extend beyond our international boarders because the Defendants’ officers lie to foreign governments too and the Defendants have no jurisdiction anywhere because the Defendants are not in the chain of title and the Defendants are not government at all but mere political corporations stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork which is the main reason why I know that We have to get rid of the Defendants’ corporations in debasement but as far as who else other that the Defendants is involved there are many because if you were looking for a paycheck you might find what appears to be good pay and benefits so the Defendants can easily attract potential employees but the Defendants tend to employ people who apparently lack normal human emotions and who have the ability to ignore right and wrong and who blindly follow the business model sustained by these Defendant judges and their officers who are still quite obviously attempting to conquer We the People of the United States of America and our Friends by stealing our Land with a gun and selling our Land back to Us and then stealing our Land from Us again and selling it back to Us and stealing our Land from us again which is war and the Defendants have a lot of help in making War and war is never fund fun and war is always ridiculous and the Defendants are in debasement because of it and everyone who is working with or for these Defendants is making War even the unseen and unknown wrongdoers are all conspiring to violate the Law and it does not matter whether they are acting maliciously or unwittingly because the Defendants and the rest of the People working for the Defendants are still a wrongdoers because they are all required to have at least some training in Law but I have never received any discovery from these Defendants because the Defendants cannot prove a case so the Defendants bluff and the Defendant’s clerks and prosecutors obstruct the defense and the local defense counselors know about it too and these Defendants apparently do not care to correct their first violations of United States Law perpetrated more than a hundred fifty years ago and these Defendants will not even follow their own court rules and it has been my personal observations that these Defendants are an unruly and bold bunch of crooks in conflict with United States Law and these Defendants have an unknown number of accomplices that these Defendants should be giving Discovery about and snitching on their business partners in debasement so We can figure out which of these Defendants are the biggest crooks
(d) List the alleged victims and state how each victim was allegedly injured.
(d) There is really no one whom this case does not affect because everyone including all the shut-ins are effected by these Defendants’ fraud and stealing and I know from personal experience that the Defendants in debasement have our People locked in jail right now that the Defendants do not have enough evidence to convict and I know from personal experience that many of the attorneys who represent our People who were arrested and brought to the Defendants’ Star Chamber court and are incarcerated in the Defendants jails right now while our People and their attorneys have not received any discovery and I know that the Defendants have never responded to any of my demands for discovery and the Defendants have recently sent me a letter stating that if I did not pay the alleged money debt that a warrant could be issued for my arrest and then the Defendants promptly turned the alleged money debt over to a private collection agency in Yakama and potential Defendant named YCCS A NATIONAL COLLECTION SYSTEM who are also an abusive and bold bunch of crooks in debasement and I had already spent about 40 days in the Defendants jail under the same case and the Defendants do not have enough evidence to convict and I told the Defendants about the lack of evidence while I was in the Defendants’ court and the Defendants public pretender Troy Lee and Ass consistently told me to “plead guilty and go home” but I could not plead guilty because that would not be true but I guess now that I should have plead guilty because my kids were in town but I am not guilty so the Defendants kept me in jail even though the Defendants could not convict and I even told the Defendants that they could not accept a plea of no contest because the Defendants do not have enough evidence to convict but the Defendants accepted the no contest plea anyway and that was the only way I that could get out of the Defendants’ debtor prison jail stockade brig and even if the Defendants had jurisdiction in the case which the Defendants obviously do not and if the Defendants even cared to respond to my demands for discovery I could clearly show the Defendants that they have not followed their own code nor any Law and I had already told the Defendants that in the Defendants’ own courts and the fact of the matter is that the Defendants have not even attempted to follow the Defendants’ own STATE code nor the Defendants’ own court rules and if the Defendants had followed the Defendants’ own code the Defendants could have easily ascertained that the Defendants do not have a legitimate claim against me or any of We the People of the United State of America and the Defendants do not have enough evidence to convict but the Defendants apparently do not care about our People enough to even attempt to see if the Defendants themselves might be wrong so We the People of the United States of America cannot be secure within Yakama Nation and we are not secure in our persons or houses and all of our personal effects are subject to the Defendants’ unwarranted extortion taxes and every year Land is stolen from our People when YAKIMACOUNTY attempts to foreclose our People from Land for failing to pay the Defendants’ extortion excise tax on our Land which is not the Defendants’ land but the Defendants continue to use the force of arms in an obvious attempt to conquer We the People of the United States of America and the Defendants apparently claim supremacy over the United States Constitution and our Treaties and our Land Patents too and these Defendants steal and destroy our homes and they destroyed my home too and that is how I know that We the People of the United States of America are not secure on our own Land and We are not secure in our own homes and We are not secure anywhere within the United States of America while this bold bunch of lawless crook Defendant judges are in charge because these Defendants will not follow their own rules nor any Laws of the United States of American nor will the Defendants follow any of the STATEOFWASHINGTON corporate bi-laws nor any WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT rulings and the past governors of STATEOFWASHINGTON were all either too ignorant or too scared of these crooks on the East side of the Cascades Mountains to do anything about the Defendants’ racketeering activities nonetheless STATEOFWASHINGTON is no safe haven anyway because it is STATEOFWASHINGTON’S treacherous codes that these Defendants blindly enforce that are detrimental to our People’s once abundant Deer herds and detrimental to our once abundant Salmon runs which are now both in an artificially short supply because of the Defendants’ own malicious designs cause these main food sources to be in short supply and the Yakamas had always had Salmon and wild game in abundance and the Defendants’ apparent business partners knowingly limit our food sources which limits our clothing and shelters too and the Defendants force an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us in order to extort our People and the Defendants destroy our homes and since the Defendants knowingly willing and intentionally limit our access to food and clothing and shelter what I am saying here is that the Defendants are intentionally trying to kill us and the Defendants are in debasement because of it and that is why the Defendants will not follow up on my explanation about who murdered Shane Bradley because the Defendants’ own officers had committed the murder and even though I told the Defendants that three CITYOFYAKIMA cops murdered Shane Bradley the Defendants have never looked into Shane’s cold case murder file and the Defendants do not have a cold case detective anyway and the Defendants locked me up for writing a letter in which I told my personal observation of Shane Bradley’s murder and the Defendants have had me forcibly poisoned under the guise of medicine in order to shut me up and I have personally witnessed the Defendants have other People forcibly poisoned too and every time the Defendants had me locked up jail I witnessed that most prisoners are given psychotropic and antipsychotic poisonous medications when there is no medical need and I was locked up with prisoners who had not received any discovery and the Defendants often force our People to have incompetent counsel who is easily controlled by these Defendants who lie to potential counselors and teach potential counselors to be unwilling and unable to assist their clients and I know of more than one instances where the accused had not receive discovery until after the trial had begun and there appears to be an endless chain of prosecutors in debasement whose misconduct is invariably backed up by these Defendant judges in debasement and the current economic situation threatens to collapse the Defendants’ extortion scheme because our People are tapped out and this bold bunch of crooked Defendants in debasement have become even more bold and the Defendants send letters to our People claiming that our People owe money debts and “THE AMOUNT MUST BE PAID IMMEDIATELY. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST…” and the Defendants are in debasement because of it and these Defendant judges back administrations which are very much in the red with We the People of the United States of American and our friends around the World and the Defendants are becoming more and more bold in light of the Defendants’ budget woes and the Defendants have known that the gig is up because I have told the Defendants that the gig is up but the Defendants are apparently desperate to hold on to their unwarrantable and apparent limitless power wielded by these Defendants and their accomplices in debasement and therefore this case most certainly effects everybody and there is nobody whom this case does not effect and many more Plaintiffs will show up and more Plaintiffs will be found when the Defendants finally produce Discovery of the Defendants’ unlawful activities and then these Defendants will be snitching on their business partners in debasement
(e) Describe in detail the pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debts alleged for each RICO claim. A description of the pattern of racketeering shall include the following information: (1) List the alleged predicate acts and the specific statutes which were allegedly violated; (2) Provide the dates of the predicate acts, the participants in the predicate acts, and a description of the facts surrounding the predicate acts; (3) If the RICO claim is based on the predicate offenses of wire fraud, mail fraud, or fraud in the sale of securities, the “party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake.” FED. R. CIV. P. 9(b). Identify time, place and contents of the alleged misrepresentations, and the identity of persons to whom and by whom the alleged misrepresentations were made; (4) State whether there has been a criminal conviction for violation of the predicate acts; (5) State whether civil litigation has resulted in a judgment in regard to the predicate acts; (6) Describe how the predicate acts form a “pattern of racketeering activity”; and (7) State whether the alleged predicate acts relate to each other as part of a common plan. If so, describe in detail.
(e) The Defendants’ most common extortion schemes are about (1) travel papers (2) taxes on Land (3) fines (4) permits and fees (5) allegations of family related debts which end up encompassing all of the above
(1) Travel papers, (a) the automobile itself, (b) the pilot in command, (c) the piracy which wrests the automobile and liberty from the pilot and places liens on Land
(a) The automobile itself -- When our People receive a new automobile from a manufacturer the paperwork that follows is the manufacturer’s certificate of origin and the Defendant STATE strong arms a copy of that original document from the manufacturer and then the Defendant STATE assumes to own the automobile in debasement and the Defendant STATE will send the People a green title certifying that the Defendant STATE owns the automobile and the Defendant STATE sends the People a green registration and a green license plate which says “WASHINGTON” followed by a secret combination and then anyone using the automobile is subject to still more extortion and any mere allegation of an automobile related debt our People are accused of a crime and the automobile is impounded and the bill cannot be paid especially when the People are in jail and ultimately the ownership of automobile is lost and those arbitrary and capricious actions are invariably sustained by these Defendant judges in debasement
(b) The pilot in command -- The corporation STATE requires our People to sign a document stating that We are in STATEOFWASHINGTON even though We are not but our People must sign such a document in order to get a “license” to be pilot in command of the automobile and then once our People do have the Defendants’ license to pilot the automobile the Defendant STATE imposes an endless barrage of travel restrictions arbitrarily administered through these Defendants’ courts which try to get our People to plead guilty to whatever the Defendants are trying to convict our People of and the Defendants apparently proceed without any regard to whether our People are guilty of anything or not and the Defendants will hold our People in jail until our People plead guilty and then the Defendants will extort our People with money judgments and the Defendants will mail our People letters stating that our People owe the Defendants money that “MUST BE PAID IMMEDIATELY. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST” and the Defendants will ruin credit if our People cannot pay the alleged debts and the Defendants even attempt to obstruct travel already covered by the Federal Aviation Regulations
(c) The Defendants’ Piratical acts which wrest the automobile from its owner because the licenses to use the automobile are at the whim of the Defendants and the Defendants’ swarm of officers are all linked to a faulty database which labels our People as debtors and the Defendants’ officers are taught to assume that the Defendants’ faulty information is correct and that our People are in violation of the law and then licenses are arbitrarily suspended by the Defendants and there is no hearing to suspend and there is no appeal and the Defendants will auction our People’s automobiles while our People are in jail and the Defendants will steal our People’s money to pay alleged fines and even if an automobile is parked on private property the Defendants back an arbitrary administration that will have a wrecking company tow the automobile to an impound yard and make our People pay to get the automobile back and the Defendants commonly place liens on Land in order to pay the Defendants’ costs incurred while stealing automobiles off of private property and the Defendants are in debasement because of it
(2) Taxes on Land – The Defendants claim all of our Land by latching on to every Land conveyance and charging an excise taxtortion which is purely extortion and the Defendants use the United States Mail to send postcards twice a year telling Landowners how much extortion they will have to pay each year and the title companies had to stop printing the Title abstracts because it causes arguments about paying extortion to YAKIMACOUNTY which is a political corporation stealing Land with the Sherriff’s gun and it is stealing because YAKIMACOUNTY is not in the chain of title and any title closing agent would know
“The American based system of land ownership today consists of three key requirements. These three are the warranty deed or some other type of deed purporting to convey ownership of land, title abstract to chronologically follow the development of these different types of deeds to a piece of property, and title insurance to protect the ownership of that land. These three ingredients must work together to ensure a systematic and orderly conveyance of a piece of property. None of these three by itself can act to completely convey possession of the land from one person to another. At least two of the three are always deemed necessary to adequately satisfy the legal system and real estate agents that the title to the property has been places in the hands of the purchaser, and often-times all three are necessary to properly pass the ownership of the land to the purchaser.” LAND PATENTS: MEMORANDUM OF LAW HISTORY, FORCE AND EFFECT OF THE LAND PATENT, p. 24-5, S. Jay Stewart. KF5675.S74 1984, Library of Congress Number 84-72491
And even STATEOFWASHINGTON requires real estate agents to read about real estate fundamentals and such a study invariably undermines the Defendants’ position because every real estate agent and every title closing agent knows that
“Title to all real estate originates with the sovereign government. The government holds absolute title to all the land within its boundaries, except what it grants to various other entities or persons. Title to land passes from the government to a private party by a document known as a patent. The patent is ultimate source of title for all the land under private ownership.” WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE FUNDAMENTALS XIII p.42, Rockwell Publishing, (425)747-7272.
In this case our Treaties are the deeds purporting to convey ownership in Land to the United States of America and the President made the Treaty with the advice and consent of the Senate because the Yakama Nation of Indians had owned this Land since time immemorial and the Yakamas knew where they are at and the Yakamas knew the geologic history for the last 10,000 years and they knew who the neighbors are because the Yakamas are related to the neighbors and the Yakamas were giving their land to the United States of America because there is safety in numbers and the first in time in the first in line and the first paperwork in the title abstract is the Treaty with the Yakama Nation of Indians (12 Stat. 951) and our Boundaries are in the Treaty and the title insurance company is the United States Department of Defense poised to come up with an underground railroad and pound the underpinning so hard that their great grandfathers will feel it
(3) Fines – Every CITY/COUNTY/STATE budget includes fines and fees as proposed revenue and the Defendants’ courts are in debasement because of it and the Defendants will not even follow their own rules and our People are faced with un-rebuttable presumption of guilt where the Defendants assume that our People are guilty and our People cannot get discovery and the public defenders pretend and tell our People to “plead guilty and go home” and the Defendants proceed against our People about alleged money debts leading to more restrictions on travel and liens on automobiles and liens on Land which of course interferes with property ownership and Land tenure and many People end up in jail about money debts about travel papers that We do not have so in that manner the Defendants interfere with interstate and foreign commerce and the Defendants are in debasement because of it
(4) Permits and Fees – The Defendants require permits and fees on everything under the sun and the Defendants interfere with our People’s access to everything including food and clothing and shelter and the very use of Land owned by We the People of the United States of America is on the whim of the Defendants through their arbitrary controls in debasement and even when such controls have clear rules the Defendants administer the rules in an arbitrary manner making any such rule capricious still and the Defendants’ policies have a malicious edge to them like the rules about hunting Our wild game and fishing and building shelter where the Defendants only let our People hunt when the eggs are dropping which is no way to expand the herd because it causes all of the offspring to be the male of the species which ultimately reduces the size and genetic strength of our herds and the Defendant STATE schedules a hunting season every year without fail when the eggs are dropping and the Defendants will arrest our People for hunting at any other time and the Defendants jail our Indians for fishing which is precisely what those Indians like Sohappy were supposed to be doing in order to increase the numbers of Salmon returning to our rivers and the Defendants in debasement know it and the Defendants destroy our People’s homes and it takes the Defendants’ so called building department longer to give permission for our People to build a house than it actually takes to build the house and I know that because I build and maintain homes and the Defendants destroyed my home when the Defendants took me through 101 White Road where the Defendants accused me of not having a permit when the Defendants knew that they had issued me a permit and the Defendants took my money and issued a permit and then ultimately told the jury that I did not have a permit and the Defendants tampered with that jury when that jury was in deliberation and then the Defendants promptly destroyed my house and the Defendants do that sort of thing all the time and the Defendants in debasement knowingly and willingly and intentionally administer policies which limits our People’s supply of food which also limits our clothing supply and also limits our ability to make shelter therefore it is obvious that the Defendants in debasement are trying to kill us and arbitrary and capricious license and permits and fees and are tools of the Defendants’ illicit trade
(5) Allegations of Family related debt – Whenever the Defendants intervene in a family relationship which is often and the Defendants use all of the above extortion schemes against all of the parties and the Defendant STATE becomes the incompetent and maliciously dangerous parent over everyone including ones husband or wife or children or elderly or infirm and even the family dog or cat risks being captured and kidnapped and ransomed and exterminated if the extortion cannot be paid and the Defendants use other arbitrary controls to revoke business licenses and licenses to use an automobile and the Defendants will place liens on Land and the Defendants will steal money out of our People’s bank accounts and the Defendants will lock our People in jail on mere allegations about money debts and in order to control our People the Defendants will hit our People from every front and make up fictitious criminal charges in order to punish our People for challenging the Defendants’ extortion schemes and the Defendants will label our People criminal or mentally ill and too incompetent to handle their own affairs and the Defendants will lie to friends and family and the Defendants will lie to the media and the Defendants will lie to the jury and attempt to defame our People and I know that because that is what the Defendants did to me on many occasions and that is what these Defendants do to a lot of our People in an obvious attempt to kill our families and the Defendants are in debasement because of it
(f) Describe in detail the alleged enterprise for each RICO claim. A description of the enterprise shall include the following information: (1) State the names of the individuals, partnerships, corporations, associations, or other legal entities, which allegedly constitute the enterprise; (2) Describe the structure, purpose, function and course of conduct of the enterprise; (3) State whether any defendants are employees, officers or directors of the alleged enterprise; (4) State whether any defendants are associated with the alleged enterprise; (5) State whether you are alleging that the defendants are individuals or entities separate from the alleged enterprise, or that the defendants are the enterprise itself, or members of the enterprise; and (6) If any defendants are alleged to be the enterprise itself, or members of the enterprise, explain whether such defendants are perpetrators, passive instruments, or victims of the alleged racketeering activity.
(f) The Defendants are political corporations stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and the Defendants are fighting amongst themselves about competing land grab deals where the Defendants are trying to scheme their way into owning Yakama Nation Land (12 Stat. 951) which is Land owned by We the People of the United States of America and Yakama Nation is the Land where I was born and the Land where I live and the Land where this United States District Court of Yakama presides and the political corporation standing armies in debasement are CITYOFUNIONGAP and CITYOFYAKIMA and YAKIMACOUNTY
CITYOFUNIONGAP officer Robert Almeida carries a gun in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy in violation of Title 18 United States code § 1962(a), (b), (c), and (d), and in violation of the Treaty with the Yakama Nation of Indians (12 Stat. 951) and Robert Northcott and Melonee Moser and Christina Chapman manage the extortion racket in debasement where our People are jailed on mere allegation of money debts and under the Defendants care the mere allegation of a money debt elevates to the level of a crime in its actual administration in the field which is invariably backed up by the Defendants’ Star Chamber courts in debasement which invariably back unlawful codes like the following code requiring our People to sign the Defendants’ civil presentment or go to jail
CITYOFUNIONGAP Municipal Code
1.01.125 - Failure to sign notice—Nonappearance in court—Misdemeanor.
(a) A person who fails to sign a notice of civil infraction is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(b) Any person wilfully violating his or her written and signed promise to appear in court or his or her written and signed promise to respond to a notice of civil infraction is guilty of a misdemeanor regardless of the disposition of the notice of civil infraction.
(c) A person who wilfully fails to pay a monetary penalty or to perform community service as required by a court under this chapter may be found in contempt of court.
(Ord. 1597 § 1, 1992)
And the Defendant officers of CITYOFUNIONGAP mode of operation is to lay an un-rebuttable presumption on our People and assume our People are guilty and the Defendants’ swarm of officers will arrest our People for refusing to sign the Defendants’ presentments and the Defendants’ officers demand that our People produce identifying documents that our People do not have but the Defendants’ officers will not even identify themselves and the Defendants will not give our People the business card of the Defendants’ office and the officers will say “we don’t have to show you that” and the Defendants’ officers will demand entry into our People’s homes and the Defendants will brandish pistols and orange shotguns and the Defendants do brandish weapons in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy to extort We the People of the United States of America and our friends who are living within or passing through Yakama Nation (12 Stat. 951) which is wholly within the United States of America and the Defendants use guns and Star Chamber courts to adjudicate War in a continuous attempt to conquer We the People of the United States of America and our friends and the Defendants perpetuate fraud originally perpetrated more than 150 years ago yet these Defendants are still in debasement committing fraud and extortion and Defendants engage in unlawful activities with the malicious vigor of fresh board pirates
CITYOFYAKIMA originally called NORTHYAKIMA had split from the original band of thieves in debasement because of each other’s conflicting land grab disputes so CITYOFYAKIMA split from the group now calling itself CITYOFUNIONGAP and went north to pursue new land grab disputes and now more than a hundred fifty years after the original fraud was committed this present bold bunch of crooks in debasement continue to perpetuate the fraud and stealing and extortion schemes galore and officer Dominic Rizzi carries a gun in furtherance of that criminal conspiracy to violate Title 18 United States code § 1962(a), (b), (c), and (d), and in violation of the Treaty with the Yakama Nation of Indians (12 Stat. 951) and Susan J Woodard and Kelley C Olwell and Kevin G Eilmes and Linda S Hagert pedestal from the CITYOFYAKIMA municipal court which is purely an extortion scheme in debasement attempting to conquer We the People of the United States of America and anyone else who may travel through Yakama Nation (12 Stat. 951) and CITYOFYAKIMA is in debasement obviously having not read the Law because they took the name that Kappler made up to catch them in compilation
(Kappler, C. J. (1904–1941). Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, vols. 1–5. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.)
And of course Kappler is a secondary source and proof that from the beginning CITYOFYAKIMA had not read the Law and it is obvious the CITYOFYAKIMA had always been stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and now these Defendants apparently license themselves to impose travel restrictions and other Land use restrictions which destroys our People’s rights and the Defendants have swarms of officers imposing unwarranted travel restrictions on our People and if unable to pay the Defendants’ extortion demands then the Defendants’ officers in debasement will make more claims against our People and the Defendants will add more restrictions on our People’s right to travel and restrict Land use and the Defendants claim to be a court but the Defendants will not follow the Defendants’ own rules and the Defendants do not have enough evidence to convict and our People cannot get discovery and the Defendants will say to our People “plead guilty and go home” or our People will have to stay in jail for pleading not guilty where there would be no jail time had our People plead guilty and paid the Defendants’ extortion schemes in debasement
YAKIMACOUNTY officer Ken Irwin carries a gun in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy in debasement to violate Title 18 United States code § 1962(a), (b), (c), and (d), and in violation of the Treaty with the Yakama Nation of Indians (12 Stat. 951) and Susan L Hahn and Michael G McCarthy and F James Gavin and Blaine G Gibson and David A Elofson and Robert E Lawrence-Berrey and Richard H Bartheld and Ruth E Reukauf and Robert W Inouye and Lani-Kai Swanhart and Gayle M Harthcock and Robyn Berndt and Harold Delia in debasement conspire to extort We the People of the United States of America and our People are jailed on a mere allegation of money debt and under the Defendants’ mischief in debasement a mere allegation of a money debt is assumed to be true and guilt is assured and the Defendants use such phony criminal charges in order to extort our People and the extortion is invariably backed up by these criminal Defendants’ Star Chamber courts in debasement where YAKIMACOUNTY is coat tailing the criminal corporation called STATEOFWASHINGTON that Defendants name as plaintiff in their Star Chamber courts and they back CITYOFYAKIMA and CITYOFUNIONGAP extortion schemes too but the Defendants are in an apparent competition to out crook each other but YAKIMACOUNTY has always been an infamous bold bunch of crooks in debasement and YAKIMACOUNTY had destroyed my house in a terroristic act while calling me a criminal and the Defendants locked me up and called me mentally ill and forcibly poisoned me under the guise of medicine and the Defendants obstructed my defense and the Defendants held me beyond the maximum penalty pretrial more than once and I finally got the Defendants wrangled into a jury trial where the Defendants had to prosecute and the jury found me not guilty and the Defendants could not have backed the case against me at the arraignment nor at any time while I sat in jail and the mental institution and the Defendants could not back the case according to the jury and the two alleged victims in debasement are the Defendants’ officers one of which is a detective in debasement and the other is Judge Ruekauf in debasement who had perjured herself to the jury which shows a malicious intent so I should be able to hammer the Defendants in debasement for their iniquities in any court of equity but the Defendants lack the resources to make me whole because the Defendants would have to extort my friends and family and the rest of our People in order to pay me off and there is no amount of money that would make me whole anyway because We the People of the United States of America made it Law to free of this bold bunch of crooks in debasement just like We have made it Law to be free of every such bold bunch of crooks in debasement and these Defendant in debasement and their extortion schemes are ruining paradise and YAKIMACOUNTY has always been stealing Land with a gun and YAKIMACOUNTY is stealing Land with a gun right now and there is no point in the foreseeable future where YAKIMACOUNTY might stop stealing land with a gun and YAKIMACOUNTY certainly will not stop all on their own so YAKIMACOUNTY is the bold bunch of crooks in debasement that Title 18 United States Code Section 2381 was enacted to remedy so the Defendants will no longer be extorting We the People of the United States of America
(g) State and describe in detail whether you are alleging that the pattern of racketeering activity and the enterprise are separate or have merged into one entity.
(g) The Defendants claim to be business partners in debasement with STATEOFWASHINGTON and the Defendants name STATEOFWASHINGTON as plaintiff in most any case the Defendants bring against our People but the Defendants have never really followed any STATEOFWASHINGTON statute or code or regulation or rule and these Defendants are known to independently carry on a pattern of racketeering activities in the name of STATEOFWASHINGTON but these Defendants’ political corporations are also waging war with each about which one of them get to steal our Land and extort our People therefore these Defendants are separate but are also somewhat merged into one entity because these Defendants rely on STATEOFWASHINGTON’S faulty data base which label our People as criminals and these Defendants are in debasement because of it
(h) Describe the alleged relationship between the activities of the enterprise and the pattern of racketeering activity. Discuss how the racketeering activity differs from the usual and daily activities of the enterprise, if at all.
(h) The Defendants’ only activities form the pattern of racketeering and the Defendants are not government at all and that fact is known all around the world because I have personally traded STATEOFWASHINGTON paper to every archive throughout the world so that every archive in the world would contain at least some evidence showing that STATEOFWASHINGTON is not government at all and all the archivist throughout the world including the STATEOFWASHINGTON’S own archivist confirms that STATEOFWASHINGTON is not government at all and the Defendants only engage is extortion so therefore there is no legitimate governmental interest in any of the Defendants’ activities because the boldest bunch of crooks in any town lack the ability to become legitimate because they are mere crooks stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and these Defendants are holding our Land and our People as hostages while these Defendants extort our People and our families and there is no known evidence to suggest that these Defendants advance any legitimate governmental interests and there is no known evidence to suggest that the Defendants are anything other than a Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization operating within United States territory and in conflict with United States Law
(I) Describe what benefits, if any, the alleged enterprise receives from the alleged pattern of racketeering.
(I) The Defendants and the Defendant corporations demand money from everyone and there is really no one that these racketeers do not extort from in one way or another and each of these Defendants receive their pay from We the People of the United States of America and the Defendant enjoy good pay and benefits and recognition and status in the community as if they were legitimate officers from a legitimate government which the Defendants most certainly are not so therefore everything that these Defendants have was acquired through a pattern of racketeering activities and therefore everything that these Defendants have are all ill-gotten gains
(j) Describe the effect of the activities of the enterprise on interstate or foreign commerce.
(j) The Defendants’ racketeering activities effect interstate and foreign commerce because the Defendants’ scheme involves fraud and misrepresentations about past and present facts and the Defendants knowingly transmit misrepresentations through United States mail and through the wires and others invariably rely on such misrepresentations such as an allegation of a suspended license being misrepresented as a criminal allegation which restricts our People’s right to travel throughout our country and the restrictions extend to travel beyond any international border and I cannot pass through any international boarder because of the Defendants’ faulty records and the Defendants flatly refuse to correct their faulty records which causes me to be denied entry at any foreign boarder and I cannot get a job because of the Defendants’ faulty records and those faulty records interfere with my right to travel within United States and elsewhere so therefore the Defendants are most certainly in debasement interfering with interstate and foreign commerce
(k) If the complaint alleges a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a), provide the following information: (1) State who received the income derived from the pattern of racketeering activity or through the collection of an unlawful debt; and (2) Describe the use or investment of such income.
(k) The Defendant judges in debasement each receive regular payments in money which is available to the Defendants for their private use and all of that money is derived through the Defendants’ pattern of racketeering activities and the Defendants enjoy good pay and benefits including retirement funds which are at risk because of this lawsuit and the Defendants are generally not bondable because they are crooks so the Defendants had to set up a fund in order to pay off any claims for damages but many of our People have tried to present such claims for damages and the Defendants refuse to pay and the Defendants’ courts obstruct anyone seeking a remedy and the Defendants’ comprehensive financial report will not pay out even when the Defendants have damaged our People and it is our People’s money anyway and whenever the Defendants do have a bond the Defendants’ bonding companies refuse to pay out which is like having no bond at all and the Defendants reinvest the proceeds of the Defendants’ racketeering activities and the Defendants expand their racketeering activities further by building more jails so the Defendants can intimidate more of our People with the ever growing prospect of going to jail because the Defendants have plenty of room to incarcerate our People who are unable or unwilling to pay the Defendants’ extortion demands and the Defendants launder bond specific money by placing such bond specific moneys into the Defendants’ general fund and then the Defendants use bond specific money to buy unauthorized things like more cop cars after the People had specifically told the Defendants specifically not to purchase more cop cars because such a purchase is an obvious attempt by the Defendants to expand the Defendants’ racketeering activities further which had already caused the Defendants to be in debasement
(l) If the complaint alleges a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(b), describe in detail the acquisition or maintenance of any interest in or control of the alleged enterprise.
(l) The Defendants are all gainfully employed by the Defendant political corporations and each Defendant is in a position that requires at least some formal training in Law and the Defendants claim to know the Law and the Defendants are always claiming that our People are violating the Law and the Defendants use the Defendants officer’s guns to do unlawful things to our People and the Defendants are stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and the Defendants are extorting We the People of the United States of America every day and the Defendants are levying war on our home turf and the Defendants are claiming law while extorting our People and the Defendants allege that our People are within STATEOFWASHINGTON which does not have any boundaries in the Laws of the United States of American as opposed to the Yakama Nation whose boundaries are clearly written in the Treaty with the Yakama Nation of Indians and Yakama Nation’s boundaries are easily identified and distinguishable from all other lands and the Treaty is printed in book 12 of the United States Statutes at Large on page 951 and that is the Law of the Land and the Defendants are deemed to know the Law of the Land even more so than other People because the Defendants are trained in law and the Defendants should know Law and that it is not lawful to steal yet that is what these Defendants are doing from within the Defendants’ own courts and the Defendants’ officers carry on the Defendants’ racketeering activities 24 hours a day seven days a week throughout the year and the Defendants’ invariably support their cops by obstructing anyone seeking a remedy in court and the Defendants cannot prove their cases at arraignment but the Defendants will send our People to jail in lieu of excessive bail which is extortion which is racketeering and the Defendants maintain control of the enterprise which constitutes a standing army levying war against We the People of the United States of America
(m) If the complaint alleges a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), provide the following information: (1) State who is employed by or associated with the enterprise. (2) State whether the same entity is both the liable “person” and the “enterprise” under § 1962(c).
(m) The Defendants have a swarm officers in debasement who are all gainfully employed by these Defendants and these Defendants’ officers generally refuse to identify themselves even when the Defendants’ officers demand entry into our People’s homes and the Defendants officers refuse to identify themselves when they stop our People along our highways in common and the Defendants’ officers are not at all like our Officers in the United States Department of Defense where our Officers are required to have a business card and our Officers are required to give a business card to anyone who asks our Officers for their business card even when our Officers are far away from the United States helping our friends elsewhere in the world our Officers know that without that business card the Officer would be no less out of uniform if the Officer was standing there naked but the Defendants’ officers operate in secrecy and within their private capacities and so do these Defendant judges and court managers because our People cannot get discovery from these Defendants unless our People hire an attorney to get discovery for them and an attorney most often costs our People more than the Defendants’ extortion scheme does and the Defendants operate with such an air of secrecy and to ask questions or to request public disclosure or FOIA is to make oneself a target and since the Defendants’ always seem to have guns out and the persons running their courts will not even follow the Defendants’ own court rules and the Defendants will not follow the STATE code and the Defendants are certainly not following United States Law and the Defendants purposely obstruct discovery so therefore I presume that all of the flesh and blood persons on the Defendants’ roster are all both the liable “person” and the “enterprise” under § 1962(c) and once the Defendants start snitching on their business partners in debasement we will have even more Defendants in debasement
(n) If the complaint alleges a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), describe the detail of the alleged conspiracy.
(n) This case originated in the form of a Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus that this Court had dismissed based on two United States Supreme Court cases and that dismissal justify me forcibly poisoned under the guise of medicine and in a mental institution but now that I am out of the mental institution I am able inform on this Court that those OREGON cases (295 US 1) and (295 US 701) which this Court used to keep me locked up and poisoned in a mental institution are fraudulent court cases backing up a fraudulent land conveyance and so threads the following conspiracy:
The OREGON cases are about Land under a lake and an Altamaha
In Oregon "I" (295 US 1) the United States Supreme Court had already ruled that the United States had not conveyed Title to the land but then the Court gave their Valentines another month to get their pillow talk straight and to submit a form of decree and then in less than a month the Valentine parties had agreed and then on April Fool's Day the Court had ruled in favor of the decree in U.S. V. OREGON (295 US 701 (1935)) as follows:
"For the purpose of carrying into effect the conclusions of the Court as stated in its opinion dated, April 1, 1935 it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed as follows: 1. At the time of the admission of the state of Oregon into the Union, February 14, 1859, 11 Stat. 383, the United States of America was the owner in fee and entitled to the possession…"
Stop!
Stop right there it could not be because the United States of America was not the owner in fee nor entitled to the possession so we have to stop right there because they are committing fraud in the OREGON cases and you need not go any further down their Saint Valentine's Day shopping list decree because prior to Saint Valentine's Day of 1859 which is the day that they are saying that STATEOFOREGON became a State of the United States the United States of America had only acquired one single solitary piece of that land in question and it is situated around the Willamette Valley and it is only one single solitary piece of land that the OREGON land grab deal was purporting to convey so the United States of America could not have conveyed title to that land not even today because the United States of America does not own all of the land in question but the United States did go on to acquire some more of that Land much later but up to that time and including 14 February 1859 the United States had only acquired one single solitary piece of that land in question and the United States of America owned no other piece of that land and all of that Land that the United States went on to acquire much later is all situated east of the Cascade Mountains and the United States does not own a single solitary piece of that Oregon coast right up to this day because We had justify those pieces out and not by mistake We had justify those pieces out on purpose
What was happening in the Saint Valentine's Day shopping list decree in the OREGON cases was that somebody was trying to steal our Land and give it to their Valentine on April Fool's Day look it up and We knew that the Defendants had been stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and We set them up and the Oregon cases were just more of their fraudulent paperwork and We had to help them with their paperwork because the paperwork had to be good enough to conceal their fraud and stealing so that nobody pointed out the fraud and stealing or We would have been massacred and although they seemed pretty good at stealing land with a gun they were not very good at the paperwork so We had to help them with their paperwork otherwise their paperwork would not work so We had to help them conceal their fraud and stealing and if anyone had pointed out their fraud and stealing We would have been massacred and so would have our Indians and these Defendants are stealing our Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork right up to this day but they cannot steal our Land with a gun and convey Title because that does not work because that is stealing and the STATEOFOREGON land grab deal could not have been closed in 1859 and it could not have closed any time since and it cannot be closed right up to this day not even close
You do not have to give away what you do not have to give away and the Treaty is a high hurdle in United States Law and technically a step even higher is a Constitutional Amendment but you cannot amend without the consent of the real States and there are more than 50 and We have only once amended the Constitution of the United States of America (1 Stat. 10) with the Bill of Rights (1 Stat. 21) and the Bill of Rights is listed in the United States Statutes at Large right after the United States Constitution and all of the other amendments beyond the Bill of Rights are all pretended legislation because they had been massacring us and our Senators and our Indians because We had been making Treaties by authority from within the United States Constitution so they split the Senate and as a matter of necessity We meet in hiding but We meet regularly as a matter of Law and our Electors have had to hold pretend elections for President because We the People of the United States of America are taught to believe that We directly elect our Presidents but the truth of the matter is that our Electors raise our Presidents from childhood so We should not have a problem but We have had problems with the crooks who kill our Presidents and the Presidential Elections are ridiculous and all pretend because We the People of the United States of America do not pick our Presidents on a whim because our Electors raise our Presidents from childhood and they have had to hold pretended elections because our adversaries had lied to the People and split the Senate and other Indians by massacre because the United States Constitution grants to the President power to make Treaties with advice and consent of the Senate provided two thirds of the Senators present concur but they had split the Senate by massacre because of our exclusive jurisdiction to negotiate Treaties and it had always been the policy of the United States of America to acquire Land by joining Tribes and making treaties with the Indians who own the land and it only makes sense that any Treaty negotiated on the site with the proper parties who own the land would be Ratified by the Senate and President at the very next session of Congress and why not?
The STATEOFOREGON fraudulent conveyance is an example of why not because the OREGON land grab deal is pretended legislation and the Treaties with the Yakama and Umatilla and Nez Perce were put on hold for nearly four years before the package deal was Ratified and the delay was because the Umatilla and Nez Perce both own some of that land that the Oregon Statute was purporting to convey and the Oregon land grab deal was going to happen anyway as a consequence of war or pretended legislation and the United States Senate had made a strategic decision to accommodate both interests while trying not to get our People massacred especially our Indians and the Oregon Statute (11 Stat. 383) and the Oregon cases "I" and "II" (295 US 1 and 701) is a fraudulent conveyance backed up by fraudulent Court cases and they must be rejected by the builders and they were because STATEOFOREGON was all wet and STATEOFWASHINGTON is in an even more precarious position than STATEOFOREGON’S Saint Valentine’s Day April Fool’s decree because STATEOFWASHINGTON had first tried to become a State of the United States in 1878 when their constitution made it to the Federal Register but no further because the boundary description is impossible as it runs the 46th Parallel to a point with the meridian 37 degrees 30 minutes west which is off the Grand Banks of Nova Scotia in a deep trench in the North Atlantic Ocean so had those lines been ran by surveyors they would of course have been all wet and those points would have been rejected by the builders on that point and they were but still apparently undeterred by their ignorance STATEOFWASHINGTON once again tried to become a State of the United States on 11 November 1889 because a President had Proclaimed but it cannot be true because that would have been unlawful use of authority because the President does not admit States into this Union all on his own so what was happening is an attempt at conquest by stealing Land with a gun but they cannot do that here or anywhere
Article IV Section 3 of the United States Constitution provides that,
"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union;"
But Congress was not in session during November of 1889 so it could not have happened then but more fraudulent paperwork does not convey Title to Land nonetheless STATEOFWASHINGTON had written a new constitution in 1889 in response to the Organic and Enabling Acts designed to coax them out and some other bold bunch crooks who were calling themselves States to come out of the woodwork and to submit their paperwork and STATEOFWASHINGTON had apparently figured out where they were at by 1889 because their boundary description is a clearly identifiable piece of land that they do not own and we know that because most of the land in question had already been acquired by the United States of America in the 1850’s from the various Tribes who own that land and We justify some pieces out and not by mistake We had justify those pieces out on purpose in order to show that STATEOFWASHINGTON is not coat-tailing the United States of America and that is why the land situated from Spokane to Oakinakane and the piece of land north of the Columbia River from Ilwaco to the Cascades are not part of the United States right up to this day because We justify those pieces out and not by mistake We had justify those pieces out on purpose in order to show that STATEOFWASHINGTON is not coat-tailing the United States of America and there is no known evidence that STATEOFWASHINGTON’S 1889 Constitution ever made it to Washington DC
Those STATEOFWASHINGTON crooks should have got the chopping block like those Treasonous CITYOFYAKIMA cops that murdered Shane Bradley because Shane Bradley’s hands were open empty and above his head and Shane Bradley was following their instructions and Shane Bradley posed no danger to those freaking cops what-so-ever but those cops are dangerous and I was there and I saw it with my own eyes that I had become a danger to my friend Shane Bradley because the terrorists were trying to control me because I am a political dissident and a tough nut to crack but Shane Bradley did not know that it is dangerous to be my friend which is the sole reason that the corrupt cops had targeted him but our local terrorists did not know that it is not my first go round with terrorist because I have followed George Herbert Walker Bush around the world where he was making messes and I was making friends and I went back around the world and cleaned up some of George’s messes and the Martian from London and the British Bankers had control of George and they like to make war and the British Banker in the Federal Reserve is a giant sea monster with devilfish tentacles who likes making war and was in a stalemate with a puffed up dragon and the lizard in London who were apparent kings of the world with Martians on the shelf in control of humans and they like to make war and they are trying to steal our Land and they were using these humans to do it and STATEOFWASHINGTON’S official story about becoming a State of the United States reads something like a weekend trip to the moon because they could not have done it
STATEOFWASHINGTON says that their 1889 constitution was Ratified by the People on 7 November 1889 but there is no evidence of that either nonetheless they claim that the STATEOFWASHINGTON constitution was ratified by the People and then sent to Washington DC only to find out that their governor had failed to sign it therefore it was returned and then the governor decided to go ahead and sign the paperwork because they were already stealing Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork so I guess that they might as well go ahead and sign the paperwork and they say that the governor went ahead and signed it and then it was sent back to Washington DC and STATEOFWASHINGTON was proclaimed to be a State of the Union by the President on 11 November 1889 which is Armistice Day but they did not disarm and it would not have mattered but it is miraculous or mischievous rather for them to say that they made the trip across the continent three times in four days because I know that they could not have done it not even today because it takes three days or more to make the one-way trip right up to this day and it would have taken them three days or more to make the one-way trip to Washington DC on Amtrak today and I know that because I have made that trip and accounting for the governor failed to sign it story they could not have made that trip in 1889 nor any time since and they could not have made that trip three times in four days right up to this day not even close and it would not have mattered if they could have made that trip three times in four days or not because you cannot square up with a gun and the President does not admit States into this Union all on his own and Congress was not due in town for another month and even if Congress had been in session the Senate would still have debated the matter and the Senate’s maps had already shown that the United States of America had already owned most of the land in question anyway
So the corporate STATEOFWASHINGTON holds our Land in an attempt at conquest which is stealing but We the People of the United States of America are not conquered and none of the so called 50 STATES own any Land or infrastructure and those corporate STATES are not really States of the United States at all but mere political corporations stealing our Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and like the STATEOFWASHINGTON crooks the STATEOFIDAHO crooks share the abyss at the forty-ninth parallel of north latitude and the thirty-ninth degree of west longitude deep in that trench in the North Atlantic Ocean and STATEOFMONTANA’S boundary begins at a point where the twenty-seventh degree of longitude intersects the forty-fifth degree of latitude where you can tell that they did not know where they were at either and STATEOFWYOMING appears to be square but because of the curvature of the globe their lines are obtuse as the lines shot from the barrel of the gun that they are stealing that land with and STATEOFCOLORADO is the color blood red for obvious reasons and STATEOFNEVADA is an illegal mining operation and STATEOFCALIFORNIA thought that they had already killed all the Indians who own that land and STATEOFCALIFORNIA has no boundaries in the United States Statutes at Large because they were killing the Indians who own that land and STATEOFARIZONA is simply an arid zone in the south and west of the Northern part of the American Continent and ARI is what it says on the Senate’s map and it is not a State of the United States at all because We the People of the United States of America have Treaties with the Indians who own that Land and New Mexico and Texas belong to the Mexican Indians and STATEOFOKLAHOMA is Indian Territory and STATEOFKANSAS is a can of sass stealing land with a gun and the Omaha floated Ní Btháska and leveled the Missouri River to spy Iowa Council’s bluff but STATEOFNEBRASKA is caught in a bigger bluff and the Dakota are not split north and south because the Dakota are the friendly Sioux east of that Red River and we justify a bunch of pieces of DAKOTA out on purpose just to prove that the corporate states of DAKOTA are not coat-tailing the United States of America and STATEOFMINNESOTA is a menace today that cares not one iota about We the People of the United States of America nor our Laws and STATEOFIOWA should be saying IOU and you and you and you and STATEOFMISSOURI is a state of misery and STATEOFARKANSAS uses an obtuse angle to fly an arc of sass from the barrel of the gun that they are stealing that land with and STATEOFLOUISIANNA is said to have been purchased from Napoleon who was never there but his army was there stealing Land with a gun and stealing everything with a gun and we gave Napoleon an Altamaha to get his freaking army out of America but his army is still here today and the United States does not own anything south of the fringe of that boot right up to this day because We justify it out and not by mistake and Penn had made some deals but GEORGIA only made steals and they are stealing Land from We the People of the United States of America and other Nations right up to this day and the STATES which are claiming all of the land east of Mississippi River are in predicament much like that of STATEOFOREGON and most notably Pennsylvania had made some deals but STATEOFGEORGIA has only made steals and they are stealing Land from We the People of the United States of America today and they gave our Indians at the Altamaha River an Altamaha and made them run at the barrel of a gun and those Indians got stampeded away from the land they had owned since time immemorial and they have owned that land ever since and they still own that land right up to this day and these corporate STATES should take a hint and stop stealing land because there is plenty room for everyone and that piece of land south of the Savanna River is shaped like a gun and it is quite the obtuse angle and it was justify out of the United States on purpose and not by mistake because we had justify that piece out right up to this day because they were shooting the Indians who own that land and we had been holding back while we were still setting up and we had to hold back and let these corporate STATES perpetrate their fraud and perpetuate it today so they would not kill us while we were still setting up and we were holding back while we were still setting up and we had to hold back as a matter of survival and while we were still setting up these corporate STATES were busy making war and they do not own any land or infrastructure and they have no basis in our Laws to claim the land they charge rent on and there is no remedy in their freaking courts because they have always been in debasement stealing land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and they are stealing our Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork right now and there is no point in the foreseeable future where these Defendants might stop stealing our Land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and these Defendant judges are always grandstanding violating the Law and ruling against us and they are now Defendants in this case because they are a bold bunch of crooks running an extortion scheme and levying war against We the People of the United States of America
(o) Describe the alleged injury to business or property.
(o) The Defendants knowingly willingly and intentionally extort everyone through one or more of the Defendants’ extortion schemes and the Defendants are obviously perpetuating the long ago hatched scheme of stealing land with a gun and covering up with fraudulent paperwork and extorting the inhabitants thereof with every kind of fine and imaginable and there is simply no way that We the People of the United States of America have not been damaged because of it and the damages are so great that it is irrelevant to calculate it all out because these Defendants cannot pay for hundreds of years of pain with ill-gotten gains alone therefore the Defendants are all bankrupt and in debasement because of it and the Defendants cannot pay for the damages these Defendants have caused and that is why I am simply setting out to put a stop to the Defendants’ unlawful activities right now
(p) Describe the direct causal relationship between the alleged injury and the violation of the RICO statute.
(p) Although the RICO statute is most often understood in the context of the Mafia these Defendants are more closely related to the Nazis in debasement who seem to have come out of nowhere set up a flag claimed the whole works and extort our People and limit our food sources which limits our clothing and limits our shelter and the Defendants place our People in concentration camps where they force our People to endure unnecessary medical experiments and the Defendants poison our People under the guise of medicine and the Defendants control our People and make our People do things detrimental to our very survival where the Defendants are hopelessly incompetent and adamantly in charge and most often incompetent except for when it really counts like when the Defendants forcibly take charge of our Water and run it down the Columbia River to sell the electricity for munitions factories to make contraptions of war and the Defendants keep our Indians from managing our Salmon runs in abundance like the Yakamas had always managed the Salmon runs and it really counts when the Defendants only let the People hunt wild game when the eggs are dropping which really counts and the Defendants without fail only let the People hunt wild game when the eggs are dropping which show a malicious intent because that kind of herd management is all bull which is no way to expand the herds that the Yakamas had always depended on and the Yakamas had always managed those herds in abundance and the Defendants’ malicious destruction of our food and clothing and shelter points to a genocidal intent where the Defendants purposely intend to kill our Salmon and our wild herds and ultimately our People which is genocide which is murder like when the Defendants’ officers murdered Shane Bradley and like when the Defendants’ officers destroyed my house and like when the Defendants took me through 101 White Road and like when the Defendants ordered me to be forcibly poisoned under the guise of medicine and like when the Defendants steal our resources and try to sell them back to us at a price we cannot afford and like when the Defendants extort us under threat of jail and only feed us food that is not good for us and the Defendants are not doing these things to our People by accident because the Defendants are doing these things on purpose and the only possible reason for it is that the Defendants intent on killing our People which is genocide which is murder and extortion is racketeering too and genocide is not casual but it is a direct relationship to the injuries in violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization statutes and I Eric Zahler of Yakama certify that to the best of my personal knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances that the Defendants are obviously and most certainly trying to kill us
(q) List the damages sustained by reason of the violation of § 1962, indicating the amount for which each defendant is allegedly liable.
(q) These Defendants only have ill-gotten gains because all of the Defendants were operating without lawful authority and within their private capacities so the Defendants are bankrupt and cannot pay and the Defendants cannot possibly make any of our People whole by stealing from the rest of our People and since there is really only one penalty under Title 18 United States Code § 2381 available to these particular Defendants it is irrelevant to indicate the amount that each defendant is liable for because these Defendants are in debasement and bankrupt and cannot pay for the Defendants’ unlawful activities and violations of Title 18 United States Code § 1962 § 2381
(r) List all other federal causes of action, if any, and provide the relevant statute numbers.
(r) Title 18 United States Code § 2381 STATEOFWASHINGTON ER 904 ADMISSIBILITY OF DOCUMENTS and Index
(s) List all pendent state claims, if any.
(s) Seeking a STATE remedy is like negotiating with Dr. Joseph Mengele while he is pulling your balls off and I make that analogy as a Jew who knows through the oral histories and through my own observations that these Defendants are doing the same things that the NAZIS did to our People and these Defendants are operating in secrecy in debasement like the NAZI hierarchy and the Defendants proceed against our People with secret proceedings like the NAZIS did and I have never received any discovery from these Defendants and these Defendant judges have never ruled in my favor on any issue especially Discovery and the Defendants will not follow any of the Defendants own court rules and every time I have sought a remedy through the rules of appellate procedure the Defendants have obstructed me in numerous ways and it is commonly understood that our People generally cannot appeal out of the Defendants’ courts unless our People can afford an attorney to perfect the appeal because the Defendants will obstruct any lesser attorney or pro se litigant especially anyone who might challenge jurisdiction so even though theoretically there are numerous remedies written in the STATE code and our People’s options should be many but these Defendants simply will not follow their own court rules and the Defendants will not follow their own regulations and the Defendants will not follow any code or laws at all because the Defendants are an arbitrary and bold bunch of crooks in debasement therefore it would be absolutely futile to seek another STATE remedy which will only give these crooks more time to stage on us and which will only prove what I have already found out for myself that there is no STATE remedy because these Defendants obstruct our People trying to access this Court too and the Defendants have no experience following any laws and these Defendants apparently only know how to obstruct and this case originates from this Court and this Court needs to stop passing the buck and start stopping these Defendants’ unlawful activities
(t) Provide any additional information that you feel would be helpful to the Court in processing your RICO claims.
(t) Every time the Defendants target me and force me into their adversarial process the Defendant judges have always been grandstanding violating the law and ruling against me and every time that I have sought Discovery the Defendants’ officers attempted to intimidate me and other People in order to obstruct us from serving process and obstructing us from receiving Discovery and the Defendants sent a swarm of officers to assault me when Martin Muench was pretending to be the Defendants’ public disclosure officer operating out of Dan Fessler’s office of assigned counsel who had forced incompetent counsel on me during the phony criminal trial where the Defendants ultimately destroyed my home when the Defendants took me through 101 White Road and since these Defendants have no boundaries this Court should expect to have the United State Marshals serve these Defendants and the Court should be expecting to compel Discovery because these Defendants have never responded to any of my demands for discovery and none of these Defendant judges have ever ruled in my favor on any issue especially a move to compel Discovery like when Defendant judge Reukauf had denied me Discovery when the Defendants destroyed my home at 101 White Road and these Defendants judges had even obstructed me from making an appeal by requiring that I pay $35.00 before my motion to proceed in forma pauperis would be presented to a judge which I could not do by myself because the Defendants were forcibly poisoning me in a mental institution and under the guise of medicine and the Defendants’ obstruction caused needless delay to my appeal which is obstruction because justice delayed is justice denied and these Defendants are in debasement because of it and I think that this Court should be ready to put a stop to any new mischief perpetrated by these particular Defendants
(u) If you cannot presently provide certain information requested above due to lack of discovery, set forth with specificity: (1) the fact(s) presently unknown but which you expect to be able to prove; (2) the nature of discovery you plan to undertake to develop such facts; (3) of whom you intend to take discovery; and (4) when you intend to commence and/or complete such discovery.
(u) (1) This is the part where the Defendants can practice what they preach by pleading guilty and snitching on their business partners because what is not commonly known is who else is in debasement supporting these Defendants
(2) The nature of discovery that I am demanding includes every document that the STATE codes and rules require that the Defendants provide as Discovery and public disclosure and FIOA
(3) The Defendants have never responded to any of my demands for Discovery and the Defendants have always obstructed me from receiving any Discovery and the Defendants always seem bring out someone asshole with a gun to intimidate me and obstruct me from receiving any Discovery therefore I intend to take Discovery through the Defendants’ attorneys and this Court and that way this Court can see the Defendants’ mischief in action and the Defendants should expect to answer interrogatories and attend video depositions
(4) I had always demanded Discovery whenever the Defendants proceeded against me and I had always demanded Discovery precisely the way that the Defendants’ own court rules say to demand Discovery but the Defendants had always flatly refused to give me any discovery and the Defendants had always ignored my demands for discovery and the Defendants’ officers set out to ambush me at Dan Fessler’s office so that they could beat the shit out of me and throw me in jail like they did to Charles W. Moore and Wiley Mills and many other People but fortunately for me there were some federal agents who had the Defendants’ officers heads wired before the Defendants’ planned assault took place which the Defendants had attempted because I had been investigating the YAKIMACOUNTY Law Library Board of Trustees who are also a bold bunch of crooks for excluding our People from the law library and even when our People had actions pending in the COUNTY’S court our People still could not get into the law library and since I had taken so much flak from these Defendants for demanding discovery and these Defendants have always refused to provide discovery and their court had always refused to compel discovery and these Defendants were always abusive to me and the Defendants try to intimidate me and these Defendants have threatened me and the Defendants’ officers show up with their guns drawn and they have beaten up our People and the Defendants’ officers murdered Shane Bradley so the Defendants’ threats are all too real therefore I am going to make up for all the years that the Defendants had abused me and filed phony criminal charges against me and had flatly refused to provide me with any discovery so therefore I may be demanding a great deal of Discovery including all the Discovery which should be available to our People who are in jail or under any sort of order of release and if the Defendant in debasement make any attempt to threaten or intimidate me or anyone helping me with the rest this investigation or if the Defendants obstruct me in any way I will be moving this Court to arrest every one of these Defendants and anyone else who might help these Defendants obstruct my investigation
Respectfully submitted this 16th day of January 2013
Eric Zahler of Yakama
PO Box 11084
Yakama 98909
(509) 910-9896
mailto:ericzahlerofyakama@live.com
http://ericzahlerofyakama.com
http://www.live365.com/stations/member_11065453459
United States District Court of Yakama
25 South 3rd Street Yakama 98901
This court has been fraudulently named
EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON
The case number is CV 2:12-03075-EFS
Eric Zahler of Yakama,
United States
V
NOTICE OF EVIDENCE RULE 904
ADMISSIBILITY OF DOCUMENTS
UNITED STATES, ET AL
Notice that these documents are being offered under STATEOFWASHINGTON Evidence Rule 904 and shall be deemed authentic and admissible without testimony or further identification, unless objection is served within 14 days of the date of notice, pursuant to ER 904(c).
INDEX
Respectfully submitted this ____ day of January 2013
Eric Zahler of Yakama
PO Box 11084
Yakama 98909
(509) 910-9896
mailto:ericzahlerofyakama@live.com
http://ericzahlerofyakama.com
http://www.live365.com/stations/member_11065453459
United States Supreme Court Opinions
FindLaw's searchable database of the Supreme Court decisions since 1893 (U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: US Reports 150-, 1893-). Browsable by year and US Reports volume number and searchable by citation, case title and full text.Browsing
Citation Search